Posted by
mormon.apologist on Thursday, February 07, 2008 12:47:19 PM
Before
I treat the implied meaning and usage of this term, let me set the
record straight on what "cult" literally means—this with
the help of one of my favorite texts of all time, The Reader's Digest
Great Encyclopedic Dictionary.
cult:
1. A system of religious rites and observances; 2. Zealous devotion
to a person, ideal, or thing; 3. The object of this devotion; 4. The
followers of a cult; a sect.
Is
zeal the problem? Why are "born-again" Christians so
zealous? Because they know something that can really change someone's
life for the better more than anything else in the world. Why are
"Mormons" even more zealous than "born-again"
Christians? Because they know the same thing and then some.
Where
the “born-again” Protestants
miss the boat is in understanding the etymological meaning of their
classification: what are they protesting? They are protesting against
the established church. Why? Because it has fallen away from the
truth—an apostasy. If the organization from which they sprang is
false, how then can they claim to be true? Here's one of their
answers: authority doesn't matter. Here's another: lineage of the
prophets (priesthood) doesn't matter. The only thing that matters to
them is believing in your heart—ordinances are merely symbolic.
It doesn't matter who baptizes or how.
You
can't get a live branch from a dead tree—if the church they broke
from had not the truth or the authority, then neither do any of the
branches that break off. THIS IS WHAT THE MORMONS KNOW but the
Protestants ignore: getting the full truth and authority after an
apostasy requires a restoration of the original and not just a
dressing-up of what is left. This is why the Mormons are so stalwart
and adamant about their case.
But
it is clear that the charge of “cult” is not leveled because of
their effervescent zeal. No, it is because they are not “mainstream.”
What are the usual traits that are associated with “cults”? Let's
look at one religion as case in point. This particular religion as a
long and colorful history: many of its ecclesiastical and secular
leaders and prominent members had verifiable issues with lying,
corruption,
licentiousness, incest,
genocide,
brutality
toward disobedient members, betrayal
and bigotry; its rituals
were bazar to say the least; its members were exclusionary and
they wore funny clothes; they clung to superstitious talismans,
practiced bodily
mutilation; they held irrational
beliefs that defy principles of physics that are irrefutable; the
religion has undergone endless fraction and infighting; and worst of
all, they believed in a plurality
of Gods and that ordinary men could actually see
God face to face. If I told you this religion is none other than
Christianity itself, would you believe me? If not, then you refute
the Holy Bible itself.
Some
of the examples I listed where plainly accurate and some were
deliberate misrepresentations, the point of which is to show that
one's view of another's religion usually is irrationally subjective.
A faithful follower or a trained theologian could give an explanation
for each one of the “problems” someone might have with the
religion, but all the explanations in the world will never satisfy
the critic.
Go
ahead and point fingers at and mock your neighbor's faith, but
remember that when it comes to “quirkiness,” all you Christians
are already neck-deep—unless you only accept parts
of the Bible. But the strength that Mormons have against all the
inconsistencies and dubious parts of the Bible is modern revelation.
The Book of Mormon confirms
that the gospel told in the Holy Bible is true and still relevant
today.